Behind-the-scenes disagreements can sometimes lead to humorous anecdotes in the film industry. A recent revelation highlights one such incident involving actors Darshan Kumaar, Priyanka Chopra, and Anushka Sharma during the filming of the 2015 movie “Dil Dhadakne Do.” The incident, which revolved around differing opinions and acting approach clashes, showcases the challenges and misunderstandings that can arise on set.
The “Dil Dhadakne Do” Revelation
Darshan Kumaar, in an interview with Bollywood Bubble, recounted the story of how Priyanka Chopra and Anushka Sharma had a disagreement concerning their experiences working with him. According to news outlets covering the interview, the discussion took place while the actresses were filming “Dil Dhadakne Do.”
Conflicting Opinions Emerge
The core of the disagreement stemmed from Chopra and Sharma sharing their perspectives on Kumaar’s work ethic and personality. Priyanka Chopra, who had previously collaborated with Kumaar on “Mary Kom,” praised him as “sweet, hardworking, and a good actor.” Her positive assessment was based on her direct experience working with him on a previous project.
However, Anushka Sharma, who co-starred with Kumaar in “NH10,” offered a contrasting viewpoint. Sharma reportedly stated, “I haven’t seen a more rude person than him.” This divergence in opinions led to a direct argument between the two actresses, each defending their stance based on their respective interactions with Kumaar.
Method Acting Misunderstanding
The root cause of this misunderstanding lies in the timing and nature of Kumaar’s film projects. During the same period, he was simultaneously filming “Mary Kom” and “NH10.” These roles demanded drastically different approaches to character portrayal.
The Brutal Antagonist
In “NH10,” Kumaar played Satbir, a brutal antagonist. To fully embody this character, Kumaar committed to method acting, a technique where an actor immerses themselves in the role, often staying in character even off-screen. This meant that Kumaar maintained Satbir’s demeanor throughout the filming process, limiting his interactions with others and remaining detached.
Kumaar explained that his commitment to method acting was a crucial part of his performance. He consciously chose to remain in character to authentically portray the role’s intensity and brutality. As a result, he did not engage with Anushka Sharma outside of their scenes, which led to Sharma’s perception of him as rude. He even recalls not greeting Sharma and only formally introducing himself after the climax scene of “NH10” had been filmed.
Clarification and Understanding
The situation was eventually clarified when Kumaar and Sharma crossed paths during the promotional activities for “NH10” in Delhi. During this encounter, Kumaar had the opportunity to explain his method acting approach to Sharma.
Upon understanding the context behind Kumaar’s behavior, Sharma’s perception of him underwent a significant shift. She realized that his aloofness was not a reflection of his personality but rather a consequence of his dedication to his role. Sharma acknowledged that she had initially misinterpreted his actions and recognized that he was, in fact, “very sweet.”
Lessons From the Set
This behind-the-scenes story from “Dil Dhadakne Do” offers valuable insights into the complexities of film production and the potential for misunderstandings to arise. It underscores the importance of communication and context in interpreting interactions on set.
The Importance of Communication
The incident highlights how a lack of communication can lead to misinterpretations and strained relationships. Had Sharma been aware of Kumaar’s method acting approach from the outset, she likely would not have formed a negative impression of him. This underscores the value of open communication and clear explanations of acting methodologies on set. Actors, directors, and crew members should strive to create an environment where such discussions are encouraged, preventing unnecessary friction and fostering a more collaborative atmosphere.
Acting Approach Clashes
The contrasting opinions of Priyanka Chopra and Anushka Sharma also shed light on the subjective nature of assessing an actor’s performance and behavior. Chopra’s positive experience working with Kumaar on “Mary Kom” was based on a different set of circumstances, where Kumaar’s role did not require him to maintain a detached or antagonistic persona. This illustrates that an actor’s behavior on set can vary significantly depending on the demands of the role and the chosen acting technique. Furthermore, it demonstrates that perceptions of an actor’s personality can be influenced by the specific context of a particular project.
Conclusion
The disagreement between Priyanka Chopra and Anushka Sharma over Darshan Kumaar during the filming of “Dil Dhadakne Do” serves as a reminder of the human element in filmmaking. Misunderstandings, often fueled by differing perspectives and a lack of context, can occur even among seasoned professionals. Ultimately, the story underscores the value of clear communication and mutual understanding in navigating the complexities of the film industry. By fostering open dialogue and recognizing the diverse approaches to acting, filmmakers can create a more harmonious and collaborative environment, leading to more successful and fulfilling projects.
